I’m not sure what terms to use to describe the
different groups on the opposite sides of the cultural divide in America. That
the divide exists there can be no doubt. What to call them is not as important
as acknowledging the enormous gap between what used to be designated as “high
brow and low brow” culture. Or should we
say popular and serious culture? Is that more “politically correct”? In any
case, let’s break it down by category:
Newspapers:
The less said about tabloid and checkbook journalism the better. We all know
what they are selling and why. Then we have The New York Times.
Magazines:
Huge first group: Sex and celebrity gossip, fashion and luxury lifestyles. Scanty
second group: National Geographic, Mother Jones, the Humanist, The Nation,
Commentary, New York Review of Books.
Television:
On one side, a plethora of reality shows, celebrity shows, talk shows, sit
coms, and general fluff and nonsense. On the other, public television, BBC
dramas, some serious in-depth interviews and journalism.
Movies:
The vast ocean of entertainment is of course Hollywood movies. The small voice
crying out with its head barely above the waves is that of some independent
low-budget artistic feature films and documentaries. The auteur director Woody Allen is perhaps the only exception: he has managed to make consistently entertaining movies with psychological depth and witty social commentary.
Music:
Pop music is everywhere and it all but drowns out jazz and classical. We have
wonderful symphony orchestras struggling all over the country, we have
Tanglewood and many other regional and local summer festivals of classical,
jazz, blues, and folk, New York has the Metropolitan Opera as well as other
opera companies, there are many small opera companies scattered throughout the
land, and there are still many public radio stations broadcasting classical
music, folk and jazz. And let’s not forget the concerts held at every
university.
Theater:
There’s Broadway looming above the nation with its bright lights and loud
mixture of melodies both past and present. Broadway tends to dominate the
theatrical life and consciousness of the country. Opposing this are the many small theater companies
of New York City that stage new work by emerging and established American and
European playwrights. Every state in the union has a regional theater company,
and some are thriving, some do quite well, most struggle, but none of them
could survive on ticket sales alone and all of them are dependent on some form
of sponsorship and expend a great deal of time and energy on fundraising. There
are many fine college and university productions of the classics.
Books:
The gargantuan commercial publishers of New York have swallowed up most of the
serious literary publishers such as Farrar, Strauss & Giroux, Knopf, Random
House, Atheneum, and Scribner’s. They stand like so many colossi astride the
main river of book publishing. One great exception is New Directions, the house
started by James Laughlin. However, we still have many small presses around the
country, presses run by the blood and sweat of dedicated men and women who love
literature and are devoted to its preservation at all costs – publishers such
as Steerforth in Vermont, Coffeehouse Press in Minneapolis, City Lights Books
in San Francisco, Melville House in New York,, and many, many others, as well as august university presses such as
Yale, Harvard, and Wesleyan.
In conclusion, there has always been some sort of
cultural divide in America, and no doubt there always will be. But never before
in our history has culture been so polarized and the division so deeply
entrenched. The mainstream or low brow or popular culture seems to grow
stronger and bigger every day, perhaps because of the internet, while high brow
or serious culture is weakened by the lack of big profits and seems to become
more marginalized and in danger of being labeled as “elitist” simply by virtue of
its appeal to a smaller and smaller segment of the populace. Yes, there are
exceptions, as always and with everything – new generations of young people who
study the classics, dedicate their careers to classical music or jazz, discover
the opera, and follow young classical musicians on YouTube and in concert
halls, but they are relatively few and rare compared with the numbers of fans
and followers of popular culture.
Agreed. Fortunately, or ironically as the case may be, the internet allows for the discovery of non-mainstream films, books and music. For the past 5 years I've not had cable television and therefore free of the poisonous energy created by the crap on the networks you describe. It seems to me that the only solution to avoiding the mind-numbing "noise" out there is to just turn it off and don't participate. I've seen dozens of excellent movies via Netflix; independent films from the US and abroad that are SO superior to the glossy garbage Hollywood pumps out. It takes effort to steer clear of the "clank of the world" as Whitman put it, but it's possible.
ReplyDeleteInteresting thoughts that, as yours often do, parallel my own….sad but true (not the parallel idea, but the lack of appreciation for art as opposed to pop culture.
ReplyDeleteOne wonders why. I suppose there is some sort of processing effort required to appreciate “the finer things” that people just don’t go there?